Read the counter-case
On this page

Zeta and Pluxee launch passkey authentication for RuPay prepaid-card payments

Our read

RuPay passkeys will make prepaid cards materially more competitive in ecommerce, but broad adoption will depend on proving that conversion gains persist without creating new account-recovery and fraud vulnerabilities.

For operators

Passkey-based RuPay prepaid payments could cut checkout friction and abandonment, making it worth prioritizing support where prepaid-card usage is meaningful.

Watch

NPCI announcements naming additional RuPay issuers, acquirers or payment gateways supporting passkeys.

Ask next

The report,

Zeta and Pluxee launched passkey authentication for RuPay prepaid-card online payments, replacing repeat SMS OTPs with biometric or device-PIN verification. The NPCI-enabled system aims to reduce fraud and checkout drop-offs, with Zeta planning expansion to additional RuPay issuers.

Passkey authentication takes 5–7 seconds against 15–25 seconds for a conventional OTP flow
  • Conventional OTP flow time15–25 seconds
  • Passkey authentication time5–7 seconds

Channel facts

From the report. Source details below

September 11, 2026 announcement date

Also in the report

  • 5–7 seconds passkey authentication time
  • 15–25 seconds conventional OTP flow time
  • approximately 99% registration completion rate
  • ₹21,367 crore digital payment fraud in FY2025
  • more than five times the prior year
  • April 1, 2026 RBI mandate effective date

What it means for online and offline

The launch creates partnership and integration opportunities with RuPay issuers, prepaid-program managers, and biometric-authentication providers as passkeys expand beyond the initial deployment.

Signals to track

  • Published data on authentication time, checkout abandonment, authorization uplift and fraud performance after rollout.
  • Reserve Bank of India or NPCI guidance on passkey, device binding, credential recovery and liability treatment.
  • Growth in RuPay prepaid ecommerce transaction share relative to UPI, wallets and debit cards.
  • Reports of account-recovery abuse, biometric spoofing concerns or materially higher false declines requiring OTP fallback.

Likely next moves

Our read of what comes next — analysis, not reported by the source.

  • Expand passkey authentication from Pluxee prepaid cards to additional RuPay issuer portfolios and transaction categories.
  • Pair passkeys with risk-based step-up controls, retaining stronger verification for new devices, unusual merchants and high-value payments.
  • Measure checkout completion, authorization rates, support contacts, fraud losses and repeat online spend against OTP-based cohorts.
  • Position prepaid cards as more viable for recurring and app-based commerce where OTP friction has historically depressed usage.
  • Merchant payment gateways and checkout platforms add passkey-ready flows to avoid losing conversion gains to alternative payment methods.

The counter-case

The case against this reading — not reported by the source.

The rollout may improve checkout speed for a narrow set of Pluxee RuPay prepaid users without materially changing payment behavior at scale. Passkeys reduce OTP friction, but adoption depends on device compatibility, user enrollment, merchant implementation, and issuer-side readiness. Prepaid-card ecommerce volumes may also be too limited for this to be a meaningful omni-channel inflection point.

The source

Source Read the source at The Hindu BusinessLine

Published

First seen