CompareFMCG
Nestle India vs Tata Consumer Products
Tata Consumer Products · Deals
Nestle India made regulation news in the last 90 days; Tata Consumer Products made none. Tata Consumer Products made deal news; Nestle India made none.
| Nestle India | Tata Consumer Products | |
|---|---|---|
| On regulation, last 90 days | 8 reports | None |
| On deals, last 90 days | None | 2 reports |
| Reports, last 90 days | 35 (34 in the 90 days before) | 28 (12 in the 90 days before) |
| Naming the rival | 5 of 35 name Tata Consumer Products | 1 of 28 name Nestle India |
| Reports, last 30 days | 11 (12 in the 30 days before) | 7 (6 in the 30 days before) |
| Cities named in store news | Odisha | Mumbai, National Capital Region |
Free account. New reports on either brand collect on your Following page as they publish.
Side by side
Counts are the reports we hold on each brand: one event counted once, phone and car launches and news outside retail left out. They show where each brand made news, not market share or store totals.
Reports that name both
6 of the 63 reports in 90 days name both Nestle India and Tata Consumer Products.
- Nestlé India, Tata Consumer and beauty brands target India’s emerging GLP-1 consumer market
Indian beauty and nutrition brands are targeting GLP-1 users. Nestle India and Dr.
- Nomura flags potential Q2 earnings surprises from Nestle India, Marico and Tata Consumer
Nomura forecasts 13.8% year-on-year sales growth for India's consumer staples companies in the July-September quarter.
- FMCG stocks rise up to 3% on festive-demand expectations
Indian FMCG shares rallied in a broader market rebound, supported by expectations of stronger Navratri-to-Diwali demand.
- FSSAI’s front-of-pack warning proposal pressures major FMCG stocks
FMCG stocks fell after FSSAI proposed prominent red front-of-pack warnings for packaged foods high in added saturated fat, sugar and salt.
Keep tracking them
Newest report . Rival pairs are the brands our reports name together that compete in the same format. All comparisons · Report an error